Trading Iron Condors - Part One

---

Trading Iron Condors - Part One
There are more option strategies than option strategists but at their heart they are all modifications of basically two ideas - buying or selling options. The proliferation of options strategies come from the infinite ways that these two concepts can be combined. Some of these combinations can be great ideas but others are just commission generators with the difference usually resting on how you implement them as a trader.

Condors
In this article we will start discussing one such combination strategy that is becoming more and more popular with option investors all the time - the iron condor. An iron condor is a combination of a long and short strangle, which is also the same as two credit spreads.

When abused, the iron condor strategy can be a great way to make money (if you are an option broker) because they are very high cost trades. However, if they are applied appropriately iron condors can be very interesting for risk tolerant investors.

Iron condors are often marketed by advisory services and brokerages as a "high probability" trade. Unfortunately that phrase is very misleading and can give option traders a false sense of security.

In this video series we will discuss why the inexperienced call these trades "high probability" and why that is not necessarily true. This is important to understand because it will focus your attention on analysis that matters rather than arbitrary and theoretical probabilities.

To illustrate this strategy we will use a case study in the video. The steps we will follow to enter an iron condor are as follows.

ADVERTISEMENTS  (ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
 
1. Liquid ETFs and index options
Costs are the enemy of option traders and many trading costs are contained in the bid/ask spread. Because and iron condor has 4 legs (4 different options) it has 4 bid-ask spreads, which can really add up to your disadvantage. Liquid ETFs like SPY, IWM or GLD and index options have tighter spreads and therefore smaller costs. In our example we will use S&P 500 ETF (SPY), which fits this liquidity requirement.

2. Create your profitability range
An iron condor starts with a short strangle. That means you are trading a short call and put that are both equidistant from the at the money strike price. You are paid the premium from these two short options but have potentially unlimited risk if the market moves beyond either strike. This is why many iron condor traders are tempted to make the range between the two short strikes very wide. If you need more help to understand strangles and selling options, click here.

This is where we run into the "high probability" problem. A wide range seems to make it more likely that the trade will end successfully but it also increases the potential losses relative to profits if you are wrong. In the video we will walk through some specific strike prices for our case study.

3. Cover the short options with long options that are even further out of the money
Short strangles make many option traders nervous because a short option has theoretically unlimited risk. One alternative to this problem is to cover each short option with a long option that is even further out of the money. This step adds a long strangle to the short strangle that has the affect of limiting the maximum risk in the trade.

This reduces the premium paid significantly but it does provide the benefit of fixing the maximum possible loss. The other benefit from this action is to reduce the margin requirement. A naked short option requires a large margin deposit that is often 20-30% of the total value of the highest strike price of the options you sold. The margin requirement for an iron condor is limited to the spread between the long and short calls or puts.

The mechanics of entering an iron condor are not that complicated when evaluated one component at a time. Like all option strategies, entering the trade is only one of the problems to be solved. In the next video in this series we will cover how to make adjustments, exiting early and expiration issues.

CONTINUED IN PART TWO...
"

---

View John Jagerson's post archive >